Photo: Andy Hay/RSPB
New study finds at least £4.4bn a year needed for nature and climate-friendly farming to meet legal targets
- UK and devolved governments must invest at least £4.4bn a year in nature and climate-friendly farming to meet environmental commitments.
- The RSPB, The Wildlife Trusts and the National Trust are calling for urgent investment to fund nature and climate friendly farming to achieve net zero, restore priority habitats and wildlife, and protect soil and water resources.
- The charities say current incentive schemes fall short, and more ambition is needed to help farmers bring back nature and tackle climate change while producing food sustainably.
A new study published today shows that at least £4.4bn a year must be invested in nature and climate-friendly farming by the UK and devolved governments over the next decade to meet legally binding commitments.
The new report, An assessment of the financial resources needed for environmental land management in the UK, is written by an independent economist and reveals that at least £4.4bn a year needs to be directed solely towards agri-environment schemes that will allow the UK to achieve its net zero greenhouse gas emissions target on land, halt and reverse the catastrophic declines of nature, improve air and water quality, and look after our cultural heritage.
The UK government currently spends about £3.5bn in total on agricultural subsidies each year. According to the report, which was commissioned by the RSPB, The Wildlife Trusts and the National Trust, the ‘scale of need’ has risen due to ongoing declines which have not been sufficiently tackled, leading to new environmental commitments and legally binding targets, most notably to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, factors such as the war in Ukraine and the associated cost of living crisis have led to significant changes in the cost drivers impacting UK agriculture.
The findings, launched at the regenerative farming festival Groundswell, come as pressure grows on the governments of the UK to explain how farmers will be supported and rewarded for their delivery of climate and nature-friendly farming practices. Around 69% of the UK is farmed [2], and a growing number of farmers, crofters and nature charities are calling for urgent investment in a future farming system that sustains and replenishes nature instead of damaging it.
The report builds on two previous studies and underlines that investment in agri-environment schemes must be on par with the level of ambition required, with the £4.4 billion also needing to support farmers by funding the creation and restoration of priority habitats and wildlife, protecting soil and water resources, and expanding organic farming.
Katie-jo Luxton, director of conservation at the RSPB, said: “Recognising the scale of investment needed includes future proofing our farming system. Put simply, nature underpins our ability to produce food, and without a system resilient to the challenges of the nature and climate emergency, we put our own long term food security at risk.
“Farmers need certainty that the necessary policies and support are in place if they’re to produce healthy food while helping to reverse wildlife declines and restore the environment. We’re concerned current schemes are simply not on track to support farmers to deliver the level of change required.”
Harry Bowell, director of land and nature at the National Trust, said: “Governments have a major opportunity to establish world-leading farming systems that are good for farmers, for people and for nature. But to do that, they must properly invest. As this report shows, the scale of need is growing, and decisive action is urgently needed to support farmers to bring back nature and tackle climate change while producing food sustainably.
Instead of the uncertainty many are facing, farmers – and the wider public – need assurance that Government promises will translate into proper investment. This is a critical moment in the future of our countryside and politicians must step up.”
Joan Edwards, director of public affairs at The Wildlife Trusts, says:
“The findings of this report are clear – the Treasury must back up political promises with more cash because we can’t continue to take nature for granted. Healthy soils, clean rivers, and thriving insect populations are crucial to our food security – and yet 1 in 9 species in the UK now face extinction and we continue to see nature declines in freefall.
If we want to reverse this, then we must learn to value nature. This new report shows that a step change in investment from our Governments is badly needed to get wildlife into recovery and take action on land to address the climate crisis. We are calling on all UK Governments to ramp up support for farmers and land managers so they feel it’s worth taking action for nature.”
An assessment of the financial resources needed for environmental land management in the UK – click here
ENDS
[registration_form]
What’s happened to all the money that’s already been handed to farmers to help wildlife? If any of this involves propping up farming that’s not needed and compromises genuine eco restoration (and flood prevention) where we could have it then no thank you. Money should be provided to help individuals/communities diversify or transition to less ecologically damaging and more rational businesses, but not keeping the same old going for the convenience of a tiny minority to the cost of everyone and everything else. This would be considerably kinder treatment than ship building, coal mining and steel making communities received when it was decided their principal employment was uneconomic.
Why is it in this country we can’t seem to have any conservation without handing over vast sums to the farming sector and in the end receive absolutely sweet FA in terms of actual wildlife for it? Whether on the Western Isles or Welsh hills the days of keeping a few scabby sheep for subsidy ranching not feeding people really, really need to come to an end.
There are so many demands for millions and billions they must stretch to the moon and back by now ! And not aware of a single one having succeeded – but it is a great way of turning politicians off.
Surely the priority now is to make the new funding regime work and fast ? Obviously, its hard to tell what happens on the ground but reading about ELMS it does look impressive and hopeful – some great options, and with no single farm payment propping everything up surely it will be harder for farmers to cherry pick – and for those who really want to go further there seem to be good payment options.
And that extra money ? I can see at least £200m/pa switching from hard flood defence to land use solutions, similarly the (re-nationalised) water industry could well be transferring another £200m from the savings on stripping agri-chemicals from water, and in both cases there will be huge carbon saving – concrete, plant, electricity adding maybe another £100m. Well planned windfarms and farm woodlands add more.
And the best way to bid for more money is on the back of success – with conservation, farmers and the public on side there really might be more money.