Not so Fine Shade (5) – privatisation by the back door?

DSCF2971_2This is a piece I have just had published on the Guardian website which puts Fineshade into the wider political context.

Why has the FC allowed Forest Holidays to submit a planning proposal with such inadequate data?

Where are those who opposed forestry privatisation when it was proposed by the front door, now it is happening by the back door?

How many more environmentally damaging developments are planned?

Please comment on the blog on the Guardian website (although, of course, you are welcome to comment here too) and spread the word.

Likes(44)Dislikes(2)
Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Get email notifications of new blog posts

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.


3 Replies to “Not so Fine Shade (5) – privatisation by the back door?”

  1. Some excellent comments at the Gaianurd! On the topic of Forest Holidays Corporate Retreats: " ... office[s] full of passive-aggressive wankers, brown-nosers, bullies, whiners, slackers, back-stabbers, and manipulative arseholes in general."

    Likes(0)Dislikes(6)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.