Fracking chemicals are carcinogenic. Radioactive radon which is also carcinogenic is brought to the surface. Water courses are polluted. In America many people no longer have clean water to drink. Check out this video which is quite an eyeopener; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEB_Wwe-uBM
There’s quite a lot of misinformation about the fracking process in the UK with regard to its local impacts on groundwater. The Lancashire fracking boreholes are drilled down to 2km which is way below the water table and there isn’t actually any way that the groundwater can be contaminated via the pipe. This is because it sits at least 1.5km above the impermeable shale bed and gas will be piped up through a lined borehole. There were definitely issues in the US such as DavidH describes though – there appears to be fewer controls on the gas industry in the US, and the geology where some of the contamination incidents took place is closer to the surface and therefore groundwater supplies.
However, I have massive issues with the extraction of shale gas for exactly the same reasons as Ralph’s cartoon. It’s the equivalent of sucking beer out of the beermats and the carpet in a bar where the barrel and the drip-tray have run dry.
I wonder how many fracking advocates have even heard of the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE much less understand it’s significance.
MikeR – welcome!
Fracking looks like the next windfarms & GM and for exactly the same reasons: top down, profit/business inspired by companies who’ll walk away saying ‘our duty is to our shareholders’ if anything goes wrong. And they wonder why people don’t trust them.
According to Greenpeace, if the Internet was a country, it would rank 5th for the amount of electricity usage, just below Japan and above Russia
This suggests that Greenpeace is a waste of pixels, that Russia should try harder, and that blogs, TwitFace, i-Things and The Cloud are not cool after all, and merely contribute to our insatiable requirement for continuous elecatricity.
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Fracking chemicals are carcinogenic. Radioactive radon which is also carcinogenic is brought to the surface. Water courses are polluted. In America many people no longer have clean water to drink. Check out this video which is quite an eyeopener;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEB_Wwe-uBM
There’s quite a lot of misinformation about the fracking process in the UK with regard to its local impacts on groundwater. The Lancashire fracking boreholes are drilled down to 2km which is way below the water table and there isn’t actually any way that the groundwater can be contaminated via the pipe. This is because it sits at least 1.5km above the impermeable shale bed and gas will be piped up through a lined borehole. There were definitely issues in the US such as DavidH describes though – there appears to be fewer controls on the gas industry in the US, and the geology where some of the contamination incidents took place is closer to the surface and therefore groundwater supplies.
However, I have massive issues with the extraction of shale gas for exactly the same reasons as Ralph’s cartoon. It’s the equivalent of sucking beer out of the beermats and the carpet in a bar where the barrel and the drip-tray have run dry.
I wonder how many fracking advocates have even heard of the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE much less understand it’s significance.
MikeR – welcome!
Fracking looks like the next windfarms & GM and for exactly the same reasons: top down, profit/business inspired by companies who’ll walk away saying ‘our duty is to our shareholders’ if anything goes wrong. And they wonder why people don’t trust them.
According to Greenpeace, if the Internet was a country, it would rank 5th for the amount of electricity usage, just below Japan and above Russia
This suggests that Greenpeace is a waste of pixels, that Russia should try harder, and that blogs, TwitFace, i-Things and The Cloud are not cool after all, and merely contribute to our insatiable requirement for continuous elecatricity.