GWCT forgot…again

Fundraising Standards Board
65 Brushfield Street
London
E1 6AA

I was recently considering making a donation to the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, using their website, and I was concerned when I was unable to discover what percentage of my donation would be spent on the cause. https://www.gwct.org.uk/donate/general-donation/

When I managed to track down a copy of their report and accounts, I was shocked to see that the charity spends £2.4m on raising funds, but only generates £7.1, which seems a very low proportion. Perhaps this is why they are so reluctant to make a solicitation statement on their website.

I was also very concerned that although I was asked to disclose my contact details as part of the process of making a donation, it was not at all clear that I would be able to opt out of email or postal communications, since I could see no data protection statement or opt-out process. I was concerned that if I provided them with my telephone number, I would be bombarded with aggressive telemarketing.

This certainly made me think twice about supporting them. There seems to be no complaints procedure either, so I thought my only choice was to complain to you.

I would be grateful if you could investigate these matters.

[registration_form]

4 Replies to “GWCT forgot…again”

  1. “the charity spends £2.4m on raising funds, but only generates £7.1”

    Doesn’t this mean they spend £2.4m on revenue generation and generate £7.1m revenue? Is that very low?! a 3x return on investment? Pretty good for a small charity in a niche sector…

    Your tone suggests you had no intention of donating to them and only did it to make a story for your little blog. A little sad if you ask me.

    1. Charlie – thank you for your comment. You think that is good?

      I don’t think I did ask you, but you are welcome to your views, of course (as I am to mine).

      1. Wonder how many of their 22,000 members receive ‘welfare’ payments through the public purse?

        Do we have detail of NE checks on adherence to various ‘conservation benefit’ agreements?

Comments are closed.