Thank you to over 1500 people who responded to my recent readers’ survey. Here are the summary results.
First a few words about how the data were collected. People were asked to participate in four ways: through this blog, through my newsblast, through tweets on Twitter and through Facebook. In all those cases, anyone coming across the survey could have passed it on to others. And through social media I made the existence of the survey potentially known to the followers of Twitter accounts as diverse as UKIP, the NFU, the RSPB and the League Against Cruel Sports. However, since we start with people connected to this blog, and to me in some way, then the respondents are in no way intended to be a representative sample of the UK population. And you aren’t – you’re very much like me!
Now a few words about how the responses were analysed. For many questions you were asked to give your opinion on a scale from 0-10. In most cases the two most ‘firm’ options, 0 and 9, received most of the responses and in some cases they received well over 80% of them. So in analysing the results I have called those ticking options 0, 1 and 2 as being of one view, those ticking 9, 8 or 7 as being of the opposing view, and regarded those in the middle, ticking 3, 4, 5 or 6, as being undecided, uninterested, unsighted or middle of the road (there weren’t many, as you’ll see, in this category).
And so when I say that the respondents were very like me that means that they were: 71% male (!), 56% aged 50-69 (4% younger than 30; 31% 30-49 years; and 9% >69 years), 79% going to vote Remain, 81% Labour (and 19% Conservative if those were the only choices), 95% convinced climate change is real, 88% convinced it has an anthropogenic cause, 92% convinced it will cause problems for people, 73% convinced that we can do something about it, 81% against grouse shooting, 46% think the RSPB was wrong to welcome the Defra Hen Harrier plan (16% think RSPB was right and 37% in the middle), 89% would expect to believe the RSPB over the Countryside Alliance, 93% don’t think there are too many birds of prey and that they are causing problems for wildlife, 80% in favour of rewilding, and 86% against a badger cull.
So, yes, you are like me. And we aren’t typical. It’s a pity really!
That is all quite interesting, and the details are interesting to me (and I will come back to some of them in future), but what I was most interested in doing was investigating whether people who disagree with me strongly on one issue often disagree with me strongly on lots of others too?
And since we are all just about to vote on whether we stay in the EU or not I was interested to see whether the Brexit supporters are also pro-grouse shooting, anti-rewilding, Countryside Alliance-believing, climate sceptics. And the results below do suggest that those keenest on Brexit are a bit more inclined to those views than are Remain enthusiasts.
What I did, partly because this was easiest thing to do and the sample sizes are big anyway, was to take the responses to the question about whether you would vote to remain or to leave and only took the very strongest responses of 0 (Brexit, n=175) and 9 (Remain, n=1082) and then I compared how those two groups answered all the other questions. Interestingly there are no differences in age or gender between Brexit and Remain groups here (I’ll spare you the details).
So, in the interests of clarity, I took the most clearly Brexit and Remain respondents and assessed whether they were In Favour, Don’t Know or Against other propositions using the (7-9, 3-6 and 0-2 categorisation described above).
Brexit are Conservative (51% where the choice is either Con or Lab)
Remain are Labour (89% where the choice is either Lab or Con)
Is climate change happening?
Brexit 73% Yes, 8% No
Remain 99% Yes, 0% No
Is climate change caused by our activities?
Brexit 64% Yes, 11% No
Remain 94% Yes, 1% No
Will impacts of climate change on humankind be harmful?
Brexit 73% Yes, 6% No
Remain 96% Yes, 0% No
Can we reduce impacts of climate change through our actions?
Brexit 58% Yes, 15% No
Remain 76% Yes, 3% No
Are you in favour of grouse shooting?
Brexit 15% Yes, 77% No
Remain 5% Yes, 83% No
Was RSPB right to welcome Defra Hen Harrier plan?
Brexit 20% Yes, 46% No
Remain 16% Yes, 47% No
Would you expect to agree with RSPB or Countryside Alliance?
Brexit 9% CA, 73% RSPB
Remain 0% CA, 93% RSPB
Are there too many birds of prey in the UK?
Brexit 9% Yes, 82% No
Remain 3% Yes, 95% No
Are you keen on rewilding?
Brexit 80% Yes, 13% No
Remain 83% Yes, 2% No
Do you object to or support badger cull?
Brexit 80% Object, 13% Support
Remain 83% Object, 2% Support
Summary: people responding to a survey on this blog on a range of controversial issues tend to agree with the views expressed in this blog – no surprises there.
People expressing a strong intention to vote Brexit tomorrow have quite similar views, overall, to those who express a strong intention to vote remain tomorrow.
However, those respondents who expressed a strong intention to vote Brexit also tended to have other views that differ from the views of this blog. Pro-Brexit respondents are more likely to be climate change sceptics, in favour of a badger cull, against rewilding, concerned about numbers of birds of prey, in favour of grouse shooting, and prone to believe the Countryside Alliance more than the RSPB.
[registration_form]
I guess the results are broadly in line with what one would have predicted a priori. I imagine the divergence between the views of Brexit and remain supporters would be rather greater in a random sample of the overall population than in the sample of readers of your blog.
It would be interesting to know how the two groups differ in their attitudes to regulation as a means of protecting wildlife and the environment in general.
Jonathan – indeed, thanks.
I don’t understand how anyone can still think that climate change isn’t our fault. Climate change will be one of the biggest things that impacts my generation.
Findlay – there are many things that I can’t understand about what people understand!
However, and this is a bit of advice for life (!), if you or I were asked to justify why we believe what we believe on climate change then I guess (for you, I’m sure for me) that pretty soon we would fall back on ‘Because a lot of people who know more about it than I do say so’ which is a good rule of thumb but it’s always wise to check things for yourself. I guess that many climate sceptics believe they have looked at the evidence and see things differently from the majority of so-called experts.
It’s always a good idea to come to your own decisions rather than just run with the flock – but sometimes that means you might get it wrong.
But I do apologise for my generation and previous ones leaving your generation and future ones such a massive problem – for I do believe it is our fault and I do think it will be a problem and I think it will be difficult to cope with.
According to an article in today’s Guardian, you should have checked our reactions to ‘disgusting’ triggers, too (more politically conservative, more easily disgusted). However, I think the mountain hare images have had a big impact on the petition this time, because they are disgusting and I’m in the survey’s 90%.
Mark You might like to check out Medialens at http://www.medialens.org/ if you have not done so already. Using Herman and Chomsky’s ” Propaganda Model” they critique the press, especially the “liberal” end of the spectrum, BBC, Guardian etc. They have produced many “alerts ” on press coverage of climate change for instance.
I am reminded of a biodiversity workshop I did a few years ago with a bunch of 18 yrs olds. Someone in the audience said that their parents’ generation (ie people of Mark and my age) didn’t know about the looming biodiversity crisis so couldn’t be blamed, but their own generation of 18 yrs olds did so they were responsible for what they did or did not do.
I had to correct him – our generation did know, we knew very well, we just chose not to do anything about it. (Mark and many others and I hope me being some of the honourable exceptions!). So they should blame their parents for leaving them this mess, and they should demand that the older generation change behaviour now and stop trashing the planet even more.
Findlay – they are choosing to ignore inconvenient truths, because at some level they think that can leave you the bill. Be angry. Be very angry. My generation has screwed up badly and we need to change now. Never let us forget that.
Interesting that the majority don’t seem to share your relentless hostility to the Defra Hen Harrier plan. Time to moderate your tone, perhaps; and even accept that it may represent a genuine solution.
Lazywell – errr… You are grasping at straws, I think. Many more think RSPB were wrong than right. Lots of don’t knows I admit but some of these are ‘Don’t know anything about it so can’t say’s.
We already know that the Inaction Plan hasn’t delivered this year, don’t we.
Nice to hear from you. Pity you can’t speak up for grouse shooting at the Bird Fair…
Disappointed, as ever, to be missing the Bird Fair, but as you know it does come at a very tricky time for us shooting conservationists. I will be putting my money where my mouth is, and proving the benefits of grouse shooting that you have heard me articulate all too often.
Lazywell – well good luck with that. I have to say not ‘all too often’ as I enjoy our occasional chats but ‘none too convincingly’ would be closer to the mark.
That really did wreak of desperate, Lazywell
Brexit 20% Yes, 46% No
Remain 16% Yes, 47% No
A staggeringly small amount of people seem to support, on either side of the EU referendum debate, the ‘official plan’. Not good really is it, considering all the big players have been promoting it. ‘Time to moderate your tone, perhaps [?]’. Nah, if a simply majority is enough to impress you, then it’s time to push just a little bit harder; there doesn’t seem very far to go (5%/4%).