Another option might be to consider selling off the prime real estate, after all there was a variation was tried with our natural treasures? Can we afford an extravagant palace given ever burgeoning numbers, particularly in the second House? Perhaps a reduction in seats should be undertaken at the same time?
Presumably any use arrangements and associated costs to public are public?
They should certainly do something about PMQs. If the senior managers at my company had a Q&A session which descended into that kind of childishness there would be a lot of P45s floating around later that day. Come to that any manager who used the kind of invective the PM does would find themselves on the receiving end of a lot of constructive dismissal claims by the end of the week too. Politicians are worse than football hooligans, they just have a better vocabulary.
Not to mention income from us!
Seriously, can we afford the model we currently fund? OK there are some who work hard but 650+850? We should live within our means?
Review and reform please ….
I think the forthcoming ‘debate’ and related procedures will be a very interesting process to witness, ever an agnostic ….
I wonder if like other buildings under repair in the city they’ll get squatters too?
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Perhaps a petition should be started?
Another option might be to consider selling off the prime real estate, after all there was a variation was tried with our natural treasures? Can we afford an extravagant palace given ever burgeoning numbers, particularly in the second House? Perhaps a reduction in seats should be undertaken at the same time?
Unfortunately the freehold belongs to the Crown so selling it might be a bit complicated. https://whoownsengland.wordpress.com/2016/09/06/who-owns-parliament/
Unfortunately?
Are you suggesting that te crown fund the repair?
Presumably any use arrangements and associated costs to public are public?
They should certainly do something about PMQs. If the senior managers at my company had a Q&A session which descended into that kind of childishness there would be a lot of P45s floating around later that day. Come to that any manager who used the kind of invective the PM does would find themselves on the receiving end of a lot of constructive dismissal claims by the end of the week too. Politicians are worse than football hooligans, they just have a better vocabulary.
Not to mention income from us!
Seriously, can we afford the model we currently fund? OK there are some who work hard but 650+850? We should live within our means?
Review and reform please ….
I think the forthcoming ‘debate’ and related procedures will be a very interesting process to witness, ever an agnostic ….
I wonder if like other buildings under repair in the city they’ll get squatters too?