I suspected there would a last-minute, late-Friday-before-the Bank-Holiday-weekend spasm of action from NE, and there was.
Wild Justice and its lawyers will be looking carefully at these.
[registration_form]Standing up for Nature
I suspected there would a last-minute, late-Friday-before-the Bank-Holiday-weekend spasm of action from NE, and there was.
Wild Justice and its lawyers will be looking carefully at these.
[registration_form]Comments are closed.
Ay, well, there’s nothing like a long Bank Holiday weekend for going out and killing some wildlife.
I notice that these new general licences do not give a taxonomic authority for the names of the birds concerned – just the usual common name and a scientific name. For at least four, carrion crow (Corvus corone), Canada goose (Branta canadensis) [both already issued], herring gull (Larus argentatus) and lesser black-backed gull (Larus graellsii) there have been recent taxonomic changes that mean that the scope of the scientific names could be unclear. If an English farmer shot a hooded crow (was Corvus corone cornix, now generally Corvus cornix) under a general licence, would that be an offence? When I were a lad, yellow-legged gull was part of the herring gull group. Etc. This might be mostly a detail, but while they are tightening up the rest of the phrasing (the licences have a section of definitions), it would not harm to specify in the licence exactly what is meant by the names they use, probably by reference to an appropriate up-to-date authority.