2 Replies to “Saturday cartoon by Ralph Underhill”
To be fair, we’ve yet to find a system that truly ‘works’ from the point of view of environmental protection. It is very clear that the unfettered market will never protect wildlife, clean air and water or soils but the environmental degradation presided over by Soviet Russia and the Chinese governments of Mao and his successors indicate that at least non-democratic forms of socialism are as prone to trashing the environment as naked capitalism.
I believe that some form of social democracy is the best option with the government taking responsibility for intervening wherever the market fails to protect the environment, the welfare of the weak and so on. The challenge is getting people to vote against their perceived immediate financial advantage in favour of what may often seem to be abstractions (however real the flames in Australia and the incinerated koalas and wallabies – to take but one example – may actually be) or remote issues with little relevance to their lives.
Any political system can destroy the natural world (or not). We need to establish as a principle, as fundamental as gravity, that it’s not just people that matter.
Even such good things as the declaration on human rights are entirely focused on us. Excessive concern with ourselves seems to be a human blind spot.
Aldo Leopold quote: “We abuse land because we see it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.”
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
To be fair, we’ve yet to find a system that truly ‘works’ from the point of view of environmental protection. It is very clear that the unfettered market will never protect wildlife, clean air and water or soils but the environmental degradation presided over by Soviet Russia and the Chinese governments of Mao and his successors indicate that at least non-democratic forms of socialism are as prone to trashing the environment as naked capitalism.
I believe that some form of social democracy is the best option with the government taking responsibility for intervening wherever the market fails to protect the environment, the welfare of the weak and so on. The challenge is getting people to vote against their perceived immediate financial advantage in favour of what may often seem to be abstractions (however real the flames in Australia and the incinerated koalas and wallabies – to take but one example – may actually be) or remote issues with little relevance to their lives.
Any political system can destroy the natural world (or not). We need to establish as a principle, as fundamental as gravity, that it’s not just people that matter.
Even such good things as the declaration on human rights are entirely focused on us. Excessive concern with ourselves seems to be a human blind spot.
Aldo Leopold quote: “We abuse land because we see it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.”