Have a look at the Wild Justice blog – click here.
[registration_form]
6 Replies to “What do gamekeepers do?”
A hell of a lot more than trapping crows.
One here in Wales today was using a rifle on feeding corvids, mixed Rooks, Crows, Jackdaws with the odd Raven. All unnecessary he his a bloody pheasant keeper.
Just shows what a great effect Wild Justice is having. It’s legal challenges are reverberating through many aspects of better protection for our wildlife. Tremendous. It is a terrific organisation driving out the Victorian attitudes to wildlife which still persist in so many areas, especially in this Westminster Government and its supporters.
Whilst accepting the non- native argument, it seems unfair that a moorland keeper can remove Carrion Crows to assist in creating grossly un-natural densities of Red Grouse, yet a genuine wild bird Pheasant shoot, with associated conservation benefits, is denied the privilege.
I suppose a few Grey Partridge could ‘appear’ to get round it that way.
As a matter of interest how many of the birds shot on your shoot are actually eaten? By humans that is.
I ask because it really does seem to me that the way forward for shooting is for it to embrace ‘shooting for the pot’ and not just for fun! Nobody in the shooting world can argue the merits of burying or incinerating the carcasses of thousands of shot birds and the zillions of non-native birds reared far outweigh any requirement for protection from predators by so-called ‘gamekeepers’. A dramatic reduction in the the numbers released, eating what you shoot, using non-toxic shot and stopping the slaughter of any creature the shooting world considers ‘vermin’ might perhaps save what used to be a country pastime which has evolved into the present hideous killing industry no civilised society should tolerate.
Everything not consumed locally is collected by reputable dealers, a certain amount being returned, processed, for sale in the farm shop.
It is a nice thought, turning the clock back to the days when everyone hunted for their own families consumption, if they ever really existed ( market gunners etc),but it is a different world
now. Neither the countryside or peoples lifestyles , to say nothing of estate economics, are
conducive to such a change.
However, things cannot carry on as they are, and the shooting organisations know this.
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
A hell of a lot more than trapping crows.
One here in Wales today was using a rifle on feeding corvids, mixed Rooks, Crows, Jackdaws with the odd Raven. All unnecessary he his a bloody pheasant keeper.
Just shows what a great effect Wild Justice is having. It’s legal challenges are reverberating through many aspects of better protection for our wildlife. Tremendous. It is a terrific organisation driving out the Victorian attitudes to wildlife which still persist in so many areas, especially in this Westminster Government and its supporters.
Whilst accepting the non- native argument, it seems unfair that a moorland keeper can remove Carrion Crows to assist in creating grossly un-natural densities of Red Grouse, yet a genuine wild bird Pheasant shoot, with associated conservation benefits, is denied the privilege.
I suppose a few Grey Partridge could ‘appear’ to get round it that way.
As a matter of interest how many of the birds shot on your shoot are actually eaten? By humans that is.
I ask because it really does seem to me that the way forward for shooting is for it to embrace ‘shooting for the pot’ and not just for fun! Nobody in the shooting world can argue the merits of burying or incinerating the carcasses of thousands of shot birds and the zillions of non-native birds reared far outweigh any requirement for protection from predators by so-called ‘gamekeepers’. A dramatic reduction in the the numbers released, eating what you shoot, using non-toxic shot and stopping the slaughter of any creature the shooting world considers ‘vermin’ might perhaps save what used to be a country pastime which has evolved into the present hideous killing industry no civilised society should tolerate.
Everything not consumed locally is collected by reputable dealers, a certain amount being returned, processed, for sale in the farm shop.
It is a nice thought, turning the clock back to the days when everyone hunted for their own families consumption, if they ever really existed ( market gunners etc),but it is a different world
now. Neither the countryside or peoples lifestyles , to say nothing of estate economics, are
conducive to such a change.
However, things cannot carry on as they are, and the shooting organisations know this.