Dear Steve Reed, just think, in a month’s time you may be in your second day in your new job as Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. How will your first day in the job have gone?
I’m a Labour Party member, living in the marginal seat of Corby in Northamptonshire, and expecting to get some leaflets later this weekend to deliver in the streets of the former shoe-making town of Raunds where I live. So, I am writing to you as a Labour supporter but also as an environmentalist of long standing. I’m five and a half years older than you are, and I have worked in nature conservation for most of my life after training as an ecologist. I was conservation director of the RSPB for 13 years and I am a co-founder of Wild Justice with Ruth Tingay and Chris Packham.
I want the next Labour government to excel on wildlife, climate and rural issues. So I’ll be dropping you a line every now and again through the next month (maybe longer!) to give you some constructive advice. You can take it or leave it, and you may never even see it, but it is offered from a left-leaning environmentalist with no vested interest whatsoever – how often have you had that in the last couple of weeks?
Just 10 points to get your attention and get you thinking:
- Hilary Benn was the best Labour Environment Secretary of the Blair/Brown era – have a chat to him.
- David Miliband made a massive difference to Defra on day 1 of his time there – ask him how he transformed the department and its civil servants so quickly
- many environmentalists vote Labour despite Labour’s environmental policies, not because of them. We’d all being voting Green if only we had Caroline Lucas or Carla Denyer as candidates in our constituencies. But someone, most probably you, is going to have to ‘do’ environment for a Labour administration. If you screw it up, we’ll all be voting Green next time around.
- the NFU is, to my mind, an anti-environment organisation. Just remember that in every State of Nature report, farming is the area with greatest wildlife losses. ‘Guardians of the Countryside’ or ‘Guardians of their Income Streams’? I might come back to this in more detail.
- land management on a broad scale (eg what are National Parks for?) and a detailed scale (eg how do we want hedgerows managed?) are crucial for delivering reduced carbon emissions, less flooding, more wildlife. These are, I’m afraid, quite nerdy and complex areas. You and your civil servants will need a lot of help from civil society to get them right.
- the state should own more land – Land for the People. I might come back to that too.
- Labour is a terribly urban party, and its advisors are mostly terribly urban people. How many pairs of wellington boots does the shadow cabinet own? Don’t pretend you know a lot about rural issues because you don’t, and you’ll look like fools to those who do. You’ll need a lot of help from civil society (I said that before didn’t I? – that’s because it is true and important).
- Rivers – a shit show. There is a strong case for taking water companies back into public ownership. The only other option is to regulate with fierce determination. Defra, the Environment Agency, Ofwat and the water companies (ie unrestrained capitalism) have failed. You won’t make things better with headlines, only with game-changing action. Very tough regulation or public ownership – the choice is yours?
- Two weeks today there is a march for wildlife in London – be there and get some other recognisable Labour faces there too – loads of you have got safe London constituencies, it shouldn’t be too much of a chore. Be there!
- Labour is going to win the general election, you are probably going to have the environment portfolio (although nothing is certain) – the Tories have been awful, you shouldn’t find it difficult to do better, but you need to do much, much better. You’ll need some help from civil society.
[registration_form]
All good points, however 3? If they screw it up you’ll vote Green next time? Hum, well you know they will screw it up, they are doing so before they are in government. So why not vote Green this time instead of waiting for the inevitable?
Labour will win anyway, but every Green vote will only make the call for PR louder.
We need a few Greens in government as a check and balance. We need PR so that every vote counts, even in safe seats.
And yes, it does mean that Reform will also get a few seats, but that’s fair to the people that voted for them.
PR will never be a panacea, but it’s a good start. It also that we will no longer be aligned with…er…Belarus.
May see you on the 22nd then.
Paul – hi Paul. No I don’t know they will screw it up, and neither do you.
The last Labour government arrived with little to offer and yet delivered the Countryside and Rights of Way Act, the Climate Change Act and the Marine Act. Let’s give them the chance.
Fair enough. But rowing back on the £28 billion wasn’t a great start.
Agreed
Labour will not need to be very good to be an improvement over the Tory governments we have endured but we need them to be much better. When I have written to my Labour MP in recent years the responses (generally sent from her constituency assistant) have tended to be rather vague. Now that they are on the brink of actually taking the helm that will not be good enough and we will need to see real, effective action to promote biodiversity. We cannot go on producing ‘targets’ which are never achieved or seriously pursued.
Your letter to Mr Reed are pertinent and tell it like it should be but will it fall on deaf ears? I subscribe to Vine House Farm for bird food and feeders and it’s owner Nicholas Watts is a farmer and life long conservationist and bird lover in the depths of rural Lincolnshire and his copious records of bird numbers and types show a depressing decline over more than 50 years and his farm and surrounding land does all the “right” things for nature so are we bowling at the moon in trying to “save” nature?
Very good, Mark, and thank you for all your efforts, always.
On point 3, though, a slightly different point to the previously commenter on that; Wouldn’t it be better to say:
“Wed all be voting Green NOW IF we had P.R” (?)
Or maybe you didn’t want to say that, and I could see why, too.
But Labour need to know that we damn well want and NEED PR.
AND if they don’t introduce it, then we’re left with no viable other option than revolution. And that will be bloody, and bloody horrible beyond words – but the only option. Fascism proper will be in the ‘competition’ at the next election. I’m expecting nothing good enough from this iteration of Labour. Labour in name only. ‘New Conservatives’ more like.