These images are all of birds shot, illegally, on Malta this spring.
[registration_form]
8 Replies to “Casualties of Spring hunting on Malta”
Am I right in thinking that under the derogation they are actually only permitted to shoot turtle doves and quail? If so the maltese government, as a minimum, are needing to introduce an eye test as part of their gun licencing regime.
Circus – correct!
Roderick Galdes (Maltese Parliamentary Secretary for Agri. Fisheries & Animal Rights) informs us all that “offenders illegally targeting protected birds may face financial fines of up to 15,000 Euro, confiscation, permenant revocation of relevant licences, imprisionment of up to 3 years and possibility of mandatory community service”.
I’ve written asking: Can we therefore ask how much revenue has been received in fines since let’s say 2009? Likewise how many licenses have been revocated and people imprisoned in the same period?
I’ll let you know if and when I receive an answer, mmmmh ….
Keep up the pressure campaigners and then let’s see if the momentum is transferable to the UK ‘Hen Harrier’ variation, perhaps even in parallel?
those people are sub-human and beneath contempt. please tell me some of those birds at least weren’t dead…
‘Those people are sub-human…..’ now where have I heard that before…..’untermensch’ anyone?
I presume Songbird Survival is opposed to the shooting of birds during spring migration through Malta, Keith?
Absolutely, and trapping in Cyprus and other Mediterranean-bordering countries, not all of whom are EU members. ‘Finch’ trapping also took place (and possibly still takes place) in UK.
For example, my father and I once came across a couple of cages with bullfinches being used as lures in a small mixed wood in Aberdeenshire, back in the late 1960s. The bullfinches were released and the cages duly rendered unusable…….. This was in the days before WCOs, wildlife crime hotlines etc and when reputable universities such as Aberdeen used to practise and condone clam-net trapping of incubating oystercatchers! Direct action was the order of the day.
In addition to MEPs and to the Maltese authorities it may be worth writing to major travel operators to raise concerns about this issue. Both TUI Group (owner of the Thomson and First Choice brands, amongst others) and Thomas Cook Group make strong claims about their commitment to sustainability. TUI claim that 82% of customers surveyed expect holiday providers to take the environmental and social impact of their holidays seriously whilst Thomas Cook, in its Sustainability report for 2013, identifies ‘conservation of natural assets and biodiversity’ as an important ‘sustainability risk’ to the company.
In the light of these commitments, and of the influence of these companies as major contributors to Malta’s economy, it seems reasonable to ask them what their position is on the shooting of birds in Malta and what steps if any they are taking (or propose to take) to influence a change in Maltese hunting laws and practices.
The companies can be contacted at:
Ms Harriet Green, CEO, Thomas Cook Group PLC, 3rd Floor, South Building, 200 Aldersgate, London EC1A 4HD
and
Mr Peter Long, Chief Executive, TUI Travel House, Crawley Business Quarter, Fleming Way, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9QL.
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Am I right in thinking that under the derogation they are actually only permitted to shoot turtle doves and quail? If so the maltese government, as a minimum, are needing to introduce an eye test as part of their gun licencing regime.
Circus – correct!
Roderick Galdes (Maltese Parliamentary Secretary for Agri. Fisheries & Animal Rights) informs us all that “offenders illegally targeting protected birds may face financial fines of up to 15,000 Euro, confiscation, permenant revocation of relevant licences, imprisionment of up to 3 years and possibility of mandatory community service”.
I’ve written asking: Can we therefore ask how much revenue has been received in fines since let’s say 2009? Likewise how many licenses have been revocated and people imprisoned in the same period?
I’ll let you know if and when I receive an answer, mmmmh ….
Our series of correspondence can be viewed via a dedicated page http://thmcf.wordpress.com/campaign-malta-massacre-on-migration/ as well as updates posted on the blog (link above).
Keep up the pressure campaigners and then let’s see if the momentum is transferable to the UK ‘Hen Harrier’ variation, perhaps even in parallel?
those people are sub-human and beneath contempt. please tell me some of those birds at least weren’t dead…
‘Those people are sub-human…..’ now where have I heard that before…..’untermensch’ anyone?
I presume Songbird Survival is opposed to the shooting of birds during spring migration through Malta, Keith?
Absolutely, and trapping in Cyprus and other Mediterranean-bordering countries, not all of whom are EU members. ‘Finch’ trapping also took place (and possibly still takes place) in UK.
For example, my father and I once came across a couple of cages with bullfinches being used as lures in a small mixed wood in Aberdeenshire, back in the late 1960s. The bullfinches were released and the cages duly rendered unusable…….. This was in the days before WCOs, wildlife crime hotlines etc and when reputable universities such as Aberdeen used to practise and condone clam-net trapping of incubating oystercatchers! Direct action was the order of the day.
In addition to MEPs and to the Maltese authorities it may be worth writing to major travel operators to raise concerns about this issue. Both TUI Group (owner of the Thomson and First Choice brands, amongst others) and Thomas Cook Group make strong claims about their commitment to sustainability. TUI claim that 82% of customers surveyed expect holiday providers to take the environmental and social impact of their holidays seriously whilst Thomas Cook, in its Sustainability report for 2013, identifies ‘conservation of natural assets and biodiversity’ as an important ‘sustainability risk’ to the company.
In the light of these commitments, and of the influence of these companies as major contributors to Malta’s economy, it seems reasonable to ask them what their position is on the shooting of birds in Malta and what steps if any they are taking (or propose to take) to influence a change in Maltese hunting laws and practices.
The companies can be contacted at:
Ms Harriet Green, CEO, Thomas Cook Group PLC, 3rd Floor, South Building, 200 Aldersgate, London EC1A 4HD
and
Mr Peter Long, Chief Executive, TUI Travel House, Crawley Business Quarter, Fleming Way, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9QL.