Lest we forget – we had from 1997-2010 a junketing, frequent flier, academic research chemist; an advertising executive, union official and foot in mouth expert; a developmental metallurgist and rolling road-block instigator; a credulous policy wonk and slave to Agenda 21 and a Union official and vegetarian.
Filbert, isn’t that the dumbest comment you could make? Given that few if any ministers have actual qualifications in the business of their ministry I’m baffled as to what the problem might be with an academic research chemist, a metallurgist or a vegetarian being put in place to manage the environment. The question is whether the individual appointed has an interest in managing and maintaining the environment, or whether their instinct is to trash it. At least those with scientific qualifications, however remote from environmental issues, will have the ability to properly respect, interpret and analyse data, something that seems to be seriously lacking in both the previous incumbent and his replacement.
“Filbert, isn’t that the dumbest comment you could make? ” – You must be new
“I’m baffled” – baffled as anyone trying to find relevance in the cartoon
“The question is whether …” – that has never been the question
“At least those … will have the ability to properly respect, interpret and analyse data” – but they didn’t, and especially the ones you left out didn’t, nor neither
“something that seems to be seriously lacking in … the previous incumbent” – he certainly was picky about whose medicine shows to attend
“and his replacement” – PPE with a mathematical bent. May shine – who knows? May do better than Dopey Davey who has just given the go-ahead for massive damage to chalk downland in a National Park in order to service an offshore array of bird killers. And who kept his job …
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
But only until the next election.
Splendidly ambiguous!
What have Environment Secretaries done for wildlife?
http://www.buglife.org.uk/blog/matt-shardlow-ceo/what-has-environment-secretary-ever-done-wildlife
Lest we forget – we had from 1997-2010 a junketing, frequent flier, academic research chemist; an advertising executive, union official and foot in mouth expert; a developmental metallurgist and rolling road-block instigator; a credulous policy wonk and slave to Agenda 21 and a Union official and vegetarian.
Filbert, isn’t that the dumbest comment you could make? Given that few if any ministers have actual qualifications in the business of their ministry I’m baffled as to what the problem might be with an academic research chemist, a metallurgist or a vegetarian being put in place to manage the environment. The question is whether the individual appointed has an interest in managing and maintaining the environment, or whether their instinct is to trash it. At least those with scientific qualifications, however remote from environmental issues, will have the ability to properly respect, interpret and analyse data, something that seems to be seriously lacking in both the previous incumbent and his replacement.
“Filbert, isn’t that the dumbest comment you could make? ” – You must be new
“I’m baffled” – baffled as anyone trying to find relevance in the cartoon
“The question is whether …” – that has never been the question
“At least those … will have the ability to properly respect, interpret and analyse data” – but they didn’t, and especially the ones you left out didn’t, nor neither
“something that seems to be seriously lacking in … the previous incumbent” – he certainly was picky about whose medicine shows to attend
“and his replacement” – PPE with a mathematical bent. May shine – who knows? May do better than Dopey Davey who has just given the go-ahead for massive damage to chalk downland in a National Park in order to service an offshore array of bird killers. And who kept his job …