Hen Harriers in England have had a good breeding season this year – there were 14 nesting attempts, of which 9 produced a total of 34 fledged young.
These 9 nests were, I think:
3 nests on United Utilities land (where grouse shooting occurs) in the Forest of Bowland, Lancashire, which were guarded by RSPB staff and produced 13 young
3 nests on Forestry Commission land in Northumberland (also designated as National Nature Reserve) which were guarded by RSPB staff and a host of other people and produced 11 young
1 nest in Cumbria on a National Nature Reserve which was guarded by RSPB staff and produced 2 young
1 more nest in Cumbria in an arable field (albeit close to a grouse moor apparently) in the Yorkshire Dales National Park which produced 4 young.
1 nest on National Trust land in the Peak District where the former shooting tenant had recently left because of a difference of opinion on management aims with the NT but which is managed for grouse shooting and which produced 4 young.
And then there were five other nests which failed. Two of these were on a famous grouse moor outside any National Park where NE has a close relationship with the land managers but where local raptor workers were concerned by the amount of interest in the nesting area shown by some local men on ATVs.
I don’t know, not for sure anyway, where the other three nests were.
Natural England, the GWCT and the Moorland Association all claim to be delighted about this and are claiming the credit for themselves, National Nature Reserves, Defra, grouse moor owners, the Hen Harrier Plan, the non-existent brood-meddling scheme. If you want to be utterly confused about what is going on then read the garbled Defra/NE press release, and if you want a real chuckle then read the Moorland Association (quoting GWCT too).
So the main people we have to thank for this good year for Hen Harriers are United Utilities and RSPB in Bowland (it’s a shame that there weren’t any Hen Harriers nesting on the Duke of Westminster’s land at Abbeystead or the Bleasdale Estate as well as on the UU land isn’t it?), the Forestry Commission, the RSPB the Northumberland National Park and Northumberland Wildlife Trust in Northumberland and the National Trust and their new shooting tenants in the Derbyshire Peak District. I’m sure there are others we should thank too but I’m not sure who they are so I can’t. It is a utility company, a non-ministerial government department and a few wildlife charities which seem to have been involved with most of the successful nests. Huge expanses of intensively managed driven grouse moors remain raptor-free zones.But the unsung heros are definitely voles. It has been a good vole year (maybe not everywhere but in lots of places) with reports from early in the season of good vole numbers and also of Short-eared Owls being more numerous than usual. More voles means more nesting Hen Harriers and vole numbers cycle up and down and we’ve been due a good year this year. So let’s hear it for the voles!
As a result of all this collaborative work 34 Hen Harriers have fledged and a good number of them are now carrying satellite tags. They are entering the dangerous part of the year – most Hen Harrier satellite tags cease to transmit, which probably means in these cases that their bearers cease to breathe – in the first six months of life. Few reach their first birthday; very few produce young themselves. Prepare yourself for a stream of ‘disappeared’ Hen Harriers over the next few months.
And the fate of those Hen Harriers is very important to the English Hen Harrier population. Bumper years like this one help bolster the breeding population for years to come.
It’s obviously nonsense to claim, as the Moorland Association does, that the licence (not activated) for brood meddling is why Hen Harriers have had a good year. But let’s see what the survival of thsoe birds is as they fly over the grouse moors of northern England in the grouse-shooting season. Most of them should still be alive at Christmas, bleeping away, unless some dark fate befalls them on a remote grouse moor – let’s hope so, but let’s see.
PS Amanda Anderson and Andrew Gilruth each have a go at our legal challenge against brood-meddling as follows:
Moorland Association, ‘Yet, certain organisations and individuals are intent on doing whatever it takes, including wasting court time and taxpayers’ money, to prevent a successful outcome’.
GWCT, ‘Activists objecting to these government plans should focus on what is best for the harrier‘.
What a nerve! And how rude to criticise the Hon Mrs Justice Lambert who, after reading the legal submissions from NE and from our lawyers, has given we activists (that’s me and 961 others at the last count who have funded our challenge) and the RSPB, leave to appeal against NE’s wrong-headed decision to licence brood-meddling.
- Posted in: Uncategorized