‘Trail’ hunting on National Trust land – the membership decides

I’m not a member of the National Trust – I switched to the National Trust for Scotland several years ago for financial and policy reasons – but if you are a member then you can vote on this matter. And whatever your view, I would encourage you to vote.

The motion is a vote on whether you want so-called trail hunting, which is often a cover for illegal Fox-killing, to be allowed on National Trust land. Now my view would be that even if all so-called trail hunting is actually just that, following a laid trail and involves no killing of Foxes at all, then I would vote against it, simply on the grounds that it is not the NT’s role to allow such a hobby on its land just because people used to do something like that in the past. And it’s hardly a wildlife-neutral activity when you consider the disturbance involved. If it involved motorbikes and groups of Rotweilers running over the countryside then it wouldn’t last long. this ‘tradition’ argument is very shaky, isn’t it?

But I don’t believe for one minute that this ‘tradional’ field ‘sport’ now is Fox-friendly. It’s clearly, for many, a tawdry cover for continuing what is now illegal. There is a strong argument that people should be allowed to do things that others dislike, can’t fathom or oppose with all their might if they don’t do anyone, or any creature, any or much harm. But this non-traditional pursuit doesn’t fall into that category. And in any case, it isn’t the NT’s job to provide outlets for such pursuits on their land unless it has a very clear overall public benefit, I’d argue. You may feel differently.

I don’t have a vote but if you do then i encourage you to make the effort to use it. Here is a handy guide from LACS to how you can vote one way – but it serves just as well as a guide on how to vote the other way – click here.

NT have produced some information on the subject too but what I’ve seen doesn’t strike me as very helpful. Their line is that they don’t support illegal activities but they fail to address in any meaningful way the allegation that trail hunting is often a cover for wildlife crime. This is something that they allow to happen on their land and yet they seem blissfully unaware of the scale of the problem, but don’t say that they know there isn’t a problem. What have they mean doing to check what happens on their own land, for heaven’s sake? The phrase wilful blindness comes to mind. Their remarks also fail to explain why it’s such a good idea to have lots of horses and dogs running around in the countryside in any case, and why the NT would be keen to encourage or allow such behaviour on their land at all.

In fact, NT is pretty restrictive about dogs on their land in general – see here. There are places where you can let your dog off the lead but as you look through the images and words then they stress how welcoming they are of dogs in some places, on leads. Funny that!

I haven’t felt sorry that I dumped my NT membership until now, and I am wishing that I could vote on this issue even though it isn’t, it really isn’t, one I feel very very strongly about.

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Get email notifications of new blog posts

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

9 Replies to “‘Trail’ hunting on National Trust land – the membership decides”

  1. I'm not a fan of trail hunting as it seems to be just a sham cover for hunts to continue to pursue foxes in defiance of the law. Thus I think it should be banned on all land, not just that owned by the NT.

  2. Thanks for bringing this to my (our) attention. I'm not a member, but I know someone who is. That person is interested (and has life membership, so is in for the long-run), previously unaware and is now aware.

  3. Very well said Mark. All the evidence shows that one cannot trust a single word that shooters and hunters say. Their activities so often bring with them illegal and cruel practices.
    There are quite a number of reasons why I won’t join the National Trust and allowing this so called “trail hunting” with all the abuses that go with it, is one of them,
    They also declined to join the Cairngorms Connect project to restore the Caledonian forest in the Cairngorms for shooting reasons.
    A lot of good words on the surface but often rather nasty actions under the surface, that is the National Trust.

    1. Presumably it would have been National Trust for Scotland who declined to take part in the Cairngorm Connect project?

    2. The National Trust only covers England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Your comment about the Cairngorms needs to be aimed at the National Trust for Scotland (a separate charity and the one that Mark is a member of).

  4. With the tech issues, and the way the question is written in the most confusing way, I'm sure that it will all turn out to be status quo at the end.

  5. More of that 'not very helpful' info from the NT which Mark failed to mention...
    "Since 2018, we have actively monitored two thirds of all licenced
    dates used. We are satisfied with the implementation of the
    conditions and believe that most groups comply with the
    requirements. There is no evidence from our properties that
    trail hunts are any more damaging to conservation than other
    licenced outdoor pursuits."
    It seems they do check what's happening on their land. They also carry out unannounced spot checks.

  6. I'd argue the National Trust aren't 'blissfully unaware' Mark. Their statement to members shows this...
    "Since 2018, we have actively monitored two thirds of all licensed
    dates used. We are satisfied with the implementation of the
    conditions and believe that most groups comply with the
    requirements. There is no evidence from our properties that
    trail hunts are any more damaging to conservation than other
    licensed outdoor pursuits."
    Tried to post this yesterday but mysteriously it hasn't shown up...

    1. Steve - the mystery is solved - I didn't get round to it.

      You did read my post? I don't believe that all trail hunts are sticking to the law, and even if they are then they are causing disturbance that isn't needed. I'd be happy to see trail hunts operating on horseback with dogs on short leads just like most dog owners have to behave when they visit NT properties.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.