Using the courts to protect the environment – it can work. What a massive result.
[registration_form]
5 Replies to “Wow! Very significant”
The 21st was a celebration day, Coul Links. This is frankly amazing.
It would be to early to think that the tide is turning, wouldn’t it?
yes, fantastic news
Of course the Heathrow Third Runway case is more about protecting local house prices, continuing the UK’s house price scandal, than it is about protecting the environment. The environment is just the means they are using to protect that end. It is not really a victory for the environment in a way that ending grouse shooting would be, for example.
Lets call this one a qualified victory, at best, with some dangerous knock on social effects.
What about HS2? Surely it is going to be illegal for exactly the same reasons?
Yes, a great result. Although the Government has said it’s going to leave it to the Heathrow Airport authority to bring it to appeal, they have also put up spokesmen this morning to re-iterate their continuing support for UK-wide airport expansion. Their lack of credibility over climate comitments could hardly be clearer.
And the cynicism of the airport industry itself is evident too as they claim they are aiming to be “carbon neutral” by 2060 – but when pressed they admit they mean the *airport* will be carbon neutral – but not the air traffic that goes through it!
Such as shame that today’s interview on the BBC lunchtime news with Roger Gale – president of the All Party Group on General Aviation – focussed entirely on the repercussions of the decision within the Westminster village. Not a single question raised about its significance for policy and politics around climate. And of course, the Labour MPs on that group, along with many of their Parliamentary colleagues, also voted for the expansion.
incredible as it seems, our MPs and media still haven’t grasped the seriousness of the situation.
Comments are closed.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
The 21st was a celebration day, Coul Links. This is frankly amazing.
It would be to early to think that the tide is turning, wouldn’t it?
yes, fantastic news
Of course the Heathrow Third Runway case is more about protecting local house prices, continuing the UK’s house price scandal, than it is about protecting the environment. The environment is just the means they are using to protect that end. It is not really a victory for the environment in a way that ending grouse shooting would be, for example.
Lets call this one a qualified victory, at best, with some dangerous knock on social effects.
What about HS2? Surely it is going to be illegal for exactly the same reasons?
Yes, a great result. Although the Government has said it’s going to leave it to the Heathrow Airport authority to bring it to appeal, they have also put up spokesmen this morning to re-iterate their continuing support for UK-wide airport expansion. Their lack of credibility over climate comitments could hardly be clearer.
And the cynicism of the airport industry itself is evident too as they claim they are aiming to be “carbon neutral” by 2060 – but when pressed they admit they mean the *airport* will be carbon neutral – but not the air traffic that goes through it!
Such as shame that today’s interview on the BBC lunchtime news with Roger Gale – president of the All Party Group on General Aviation – focussed entirely on the repercussions of the decision within the Westminster village. Not a single question raised about its significance for policy and politics around climate. And of course, the Labour MPs on that group, along with many of their Parliamentary colleagues, also voted for the expansion.
incredible as it seems, our MPs and media still haven’t grasped the seriousness of the situation.