Hebden Bridge in the Calder Valley has experienced terrible floods in recent years. Locals blame the severity of these floods on the intensive management of Walshaw Moor for driven grouse shooting. Now there appears to be some new scientific evidence to strengthen that view.
In May 2014 I visited Hebden Bridge and spoke to the then owner of the Crown Inn, Lesley Wood. I stayed in the Crown Inn and had a look at Walshaw Moor too. You can read an account of it in Inglorious pp188-92. Last year I spoke at the Trades Club in Hebden Bridge in October about why we should ban driven grouse shooting and I stayed in the Crown Inn again under new management. Over the Christmas period Hebden Bridge flooded and I’ve always wondered how the Crown Inn fared this time around.
Hebden Bridge is in the Calder Valley constituency which provided 870 signatures to our 123,076 total. To put that in context, if all UK constituencies had been as prolific we would have amassed 565,500 signatures.
So, I feel a little bit emotionally involved in the folk of Hebden Bridge and the Calder Valley, and I keep an eye on their ‘Ban the Burn’ campaign. So it was with interest that I saw this report on their website. There is a new report from Durham University which seems to back up the belief that increased flooding is due to the management of the hills above Hebden Bridge. The report itself is only a summary and the it is quite telegrammatic in style. It’s not my area of expertise and whereas I reckon I 70% understand 70% of it that isn’t quite enough to be very certain that I really understand it, and more importantly, its limitations.
And the author, Dr N. Odani, who is an Honorary Fellow in the Geography Department at Durham hasn’t responded to my emails so far. And so I wouldn’t want to go overboard on pointing out this study. However, increased flood risk, we know, is likely to arise from the burning of heather moorland and I’m absolutely certain that Dr Odoni knows more about this subject than I do.
Heather burning has increased quite dramatically in the English uplands in recent years. And extreme rainfall events seem commoner too, and are expected to become even commoner. The combination of more burning and more heavy rain seems a recipe for increased flooding of communities such as Hebden Bridge.
The economic damage caused to businesses and homes in places like Hebden Bridge can be illustrated by Lesley Wood’s tale. Her business was closed for 6 months and the insurance company only covered about half the costs of repair and renovation. There was then the long process of building her business back up again, and worrying every time she heard rain on the roof at night. It’s easy to imagine that Lesley’s business lost a quarter of a million pounds because of the 2012 floods and that story was repeated for many businesses in Crown Street, Hebden Bridge, and beyond in 2012. A total cost of £50m wouldn’t be out of the question. And then it happened again, and was worse, in December 2015.
To the extent that heather burning up the hill added to the woes of the businesses and residents of Hebden Bridge it could be a classic case of personal gain (in day’s shooting) for the few having a much larger cost for the many downstream.
What price should we put on flooding to include the misery as well as the straight economic impact – and how do we set that off against the hobby of shooting birds for fun? How much fun for people like millionaire grouse shooter Richard Bannister should be allowed for how much misery for the likes of Lesley Wood?
So it isn’t surprising really that the Calder Valley constituents have been keen supporters of our e-petition to ban driven grouse shooting. And it isn’t surprising that they have sent in evidence to the House of Commons inquiry into grouse shooting. What is more surprising is that their MP, Craig Whitaker, hasn’t decided which side he is on yet. We do know that he has sought the views of Richard Bannister though.
3 Replies to “Flood risk at Hebden Bridge (Wuthering Moors 54)”
Talk about coincidence I’ve just copied a report hoping to put link somewhere on one fo your posts – it’s a report about how Rewilding can reduce flood risk http://www.rewildingbritain.org.uk/assets/uploads/files/publications/Final-flood-report/Rewilding-Britain-Flood-Report-Sep-6-16.pdf
The estates might try to quibble that they don’t contribute to flood risk, they are removing drainage (uumm..what about Walshaw Moor then?), but where they really fall down is that can you see any of them gladly planting trees in appropriate places to divert rainwater into soil rather than run over the top of it, and planting trees along the banks of their watercourses? Dead wood in the water will help hold it back in heavier flows. Beaver dams of course would be brilliant for this. There are vast tracts of our uplands (tend to be rolling hills rather than ‘Alpinesque’) where we could reinatate riparian woodland and eventually beavers whose dams would hold back vast quantities of water helping to keep high quality farmland, businesses and homes downstream dry. And its effects on food production, economic loss would be negligible. Big, big win. The only possible losers driven grouse shooters who would probably have their bags compromised slightly. I know I’ve made these points before so please forgive me for being repetitive, but anyone dragging their feet over implementing these changes risks having the finger pointed at them the next time there are floods which will of course have been worse than they needed to be. Woulkdn’t like to be in their shoes!
No they would find that beavers harvest ticks that would affect the yeald of paltry grouse. Therefore, unmentionable.
Trees are what we need
Just received a brief reply from Scott Benton ,Parlimentary Assistant who confirms that Craig Whittaker intends to speak in the Debate and will put something on his website relating to this issue afterwards !!
Comments are closed.