Letter to my MP – parts 1 and 2 of three

This is a letter sent to MP today. This is the second instalment dealing with the matter of burning in the uplands (paragraph in bold).

Dear Mr Pursglove


You are always kind enough to respond to me and you were particularly informative and helpful in our recent exchange. Thank you.

You have now posted your response to the e-action, which was taken by 123,678 participants (including myself) and of which I was one of the instigators, on your website.

I have two questions about your response and a further related one.

  1. You write ‘After speaking to the minister about your concerns…’ and I’d be very grateful if you could tell me to which minister (presumably at DEFRA) you spoke and on which date. It’s not that I doubt you – well, actually, it is!  I do doubt the veracity of this remark since the same words have been used by scores of Conservative MPs and I just find it difficult to believe that all those conversations took place.   I wonder whether it has been used by other MPs, not you, to put off their constituents from reminding their MPs that they had asked for their concerns to be forwarded to DEFRA for a response, but since you did tell me that you had done that already no such motive can be ascribed to you (well, not in my case).  So which minister and when please? And you should know that I have asked DEFRA via a freedom of information request for the same details for all those conversations claimed by Conservative MPs. To make it more fun, I’ll be happy to pay £50 to a charity related to human health (mental or physical) if you and DEFRA give me accounts that coincide.
  2. You also write that ministers have always been clear of the need to end rotational burning (well, my involvement in this issue is both longer and deeper than yours) and I can assure you that is untrue, but never mind, since you go on to say that you are pleased to hear that legislation is being looked at to bring this about. I might be wrong but I think that a mere signing of a statutory instrument is needed to make this change. However, given your response and that of so many of your parliamentary colleagues (using the very same words) I was slightly alarmed to see in The Times yesterday a report that such a policy had been dropped. That can’t be the case surely? Surely not after the assurance by Zac Goldsmith that such measures would be taken and the call by the Committee on Climate Change in January this year that such burning should be banned this year. You’ll recall that the Chair of the CCC is a former Environment Secretary, and one of the best in my experience, John Gummer, now Lord Deben.  I know that breaking its word seems to be part of this government’s modus operandi (Brexit deals, Track and Trace, PEP for example) but surely there is something that we can believe from your ministerial colleagues? Maybe the response that you have requested from DEFRA will enlighten me. I hope so or else this correspondence may have to be prolonged.

…to be continued

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Get email notifications of new blog posts

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

2 Replies to “Letter to my MP – parts 1 and 2 of three”

  1. "the same words have been used by scores of Conservative MPs"

    They are all at it. Copy & paste saves thinking & stays on message


    1. I once had it explained to me by my then Labour MP that it is rare for a Tory MP to see beyond the banknote on the end of his/her nose let alone him/her being capable of independent thought.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.